Common Sense for Uncommon Times - Fair and Balanced |
|
|
Random, occasionally rambling thoughts with links to interesting, scandalous, or partisan news of the day. Fair and Balanced
We owe the liberty and freedom we take for granted to the enlisted men and women in the armed forces. They sacrifice family, ease, and even life laboring in service to all of us. The least we can do for them is honor their devotion with dignified pay scales, decent education for themselves and their children, and reasonable compensation for service away from their families and death on the battlefield. Flag waving politicians who praise the troops on one hand and cut their pay and benefits with the other should be deeply ashamed of themselves.
|
Friday, November 29, 2002
In Media Res Krugman on media fairness, consolidation, and ownership. Why is it that none of the other media reporters are as good as Paul, none of the economic reporters are as good as Paul, and none of the political reporters are as good as Paul? I like Paul, but he's not that universally gifted. I think the secret is that the mainstream press is quite uniformly cowed into writing junk. They spent their bile on Clinton and all they have left is, "Yes, Ari, please pass the gravy...". posted by Dave on 1:59 AM | 0 comments link -------------------- Thursday, November 28, 2002
Kissinger's Back and he doesn't like the truth. posted by Dave on 11:54 PM | 0 comments link
The Latest Kissinger Outrage - Why is a proven liar and wanted man in charge of the 9/11 investigation? By Christopher Hitchens First Sullivan, now Hitchens. It just goes to show that on this site what you write matters more than who writes it. posted by Dave on 11:01 AM | 0 comments link
Thwarting an African Taliban (washingtonpost.com) But in recent days the pageant has provoked violence between Christians and Muslims in the northern city of Kaduna,... What's the missing context here? Why does the Washington Post frame this as violence between Christians and Muslims? Why is the active phrase in this sentence "the pageant has provoked" ? Only the most obtuse could write this as anything but, "Islamic extremists rampaged and killed hundreds because of a newspaper reporter's speculation about Mohammed's behavior." (oh yeah, PBUH, no fatwa for me, today please, I already gave at the office) The role of the Christians here is the same as in the Biblical and Roman epics of Hollywood. They were the spear carriers, there to be victims of the Muslims. As for the pageant provoking this violence. The pageant, dated and irrelevant as it is, had chosen Nigeria precisely to help the economy, celebrate last year's winner, and bring international attention to this sadly corrupt place. They were an excuse for the bad boys of Islam to run amok. To sugar coat the facts as this editorial does is simply dishonest journalism and sloppy thinking. Of course the rioting isn't the fault of moderate American Muslims or Palestinians or Afghans. It's the fault of the handful of people who instigated it, and the larger groups who participated. But don't blame the Christians who may have eventually fought back and created victims of their own. They're the aggrieved and victimized party here, as is the Miss World pageant, the nation of Nigeria, and the image of Islam as a religion of peace. posted by Dave on 12:20 AM | 0 comments link -------------------- Wednesday, November 27, 2002
A call to service in the modern world This posting is for Tom Delay, George Bush, and Trent Lott. This posting is for the pharmaceutical company CEO's and the military contractors at the Carlyle Group and the lobbyists at K Street. You have your moment now, when the stars are aligned and the heavens themselves seem to smile on your efforts. Remember then, my friends, what this simple posting asks of you and remember Paul Wellstone, who understood. posted by Dave on 10:45 PM | 0 comments link
Mugabe starving his people...again Another in a seemingly endless, "Africa is hopeless" stories. Not what you wanted to read on Thanksgiving, perhaps, but I thought you should know. It fits so well with selling your young daughters so you can raise the money for food for your other children. Oh, in case I forgot to mention it, the girls are being sold for wives at ages as young as eight, usually into households where their likelihood of contracting HIV/AIDS is high. But don't worry. As long as the Christians start fighting back against the Nigerian Muslims who keep killing people, maybe you won't live long enough to get AIDS. But what if you live in South Africa, you ask. Well, not to worry my friend. A group of whites was planning to kill millions of blacks by poisoning their water. I don't know about you, my friend, but I wouldn't mind equipping a few tens of thousands of our best African American veterans to go kick some ass and take over the continent. There's no way we could do a worse job than the tin pot dictators and profiteers running the place now. South Africa's cool, and maybe a couple of the other states, but by and large, the bums need to be tossed out. Africa is richly blessed with resources, climate, and potential, but the legacy of colonialism has never been shed and the lessons of democracy and free markets have never been learned. It's a crime to stand by and watch 20% or more of an entire country die of AIDS without helping. It's a crime to watch Mugabe starve his own people to cement his own stolen election. It's a crime to watch Muslim fanatics butcher Christians who have the misfortune to live in the neighborhood of medieval, female-mutilating fanatics. Enough is truly enough. posted by Dave on 10:35 PM | 0 comments link
The Consortium The story behind Gore's complaints from the 2000 campaign. posted by Dave on 2:45 PM | 0 comments link
Anti-Americanism Sweeps South Korea I'm linking to this story as a simple hubris check for Americans. My previous link was to a Salman Rushdie op-ed about the violence in Islamic countries and the lack of condemnation of those events by moderate Muslims. I agree with him on this. This article talks about an accident in South Korea where two Americans killed two young Korean girls. The soldiers were acquitted and the Koreans are outraged. Leaving aside guilt or innocence, it appears that an appropriate apology from the administration would have gone far to soothe the pain the Koreans feel over this. Let's not stop asking our moderate Muslim friends to condemn bad behavior by their co-religionists. At the same time we need to recognize that much of the world is asking us for equivalent respect. It's the right thing to do, both politically and morally. The Bush administration should pay higher level attention to this Korean incident and make an acceptable apology. posted by Dave on 8:55 AM | 0 comments link
No More Fanaticism as Usual Be proud to be a Rushdie. In this stinging editorial Salman Rushdie takes moderate Muslims to task for not rejecting the excesses of their Islamist brethren. Calling writers the next Rushdie seems to be the prelude to bad behavior by the religionists, so Salman reclaims his name and the pride that goes with taking a righteous position. Hear, hear! posted by Dave on 8:36 AM | 0 comments link -------------------- Tuesday, November 26, 2002
Salon.com News | Beauties and the beasts I'll even blog Sullivan when he's right. The slaughter in Nigeria has only one parent and his name is Islam. posted by Dave on 8:41 PM | 0 comments link
Payoffs, pro and con, in Homeland Security Politics is a contact sport, so some grass stains, twisted ankles, and hurt feelings are probable. In this Financial Times piece they analyze the winners and losers on this bill. The most striking sentence for me was the one discussing the protection from lawsuits for Eli Lilly. Here's the money line: "No member of the House has yet claimed any responsibility for putting the measure into the 500-page bill before it was passed." Excuse my blatant stupidity, but I would imagine my fellow citizens wouldn't endorse a process for legislation that left no fingerprints. If a legislator won't stand up, line by line, to support a bill, they shouldn't be allowed to introduce it or stick it into an unrelated bill. Let's call it the Balls Amendment. It's real simple. Here's the proposed text. "No words shall appear in any bill or legislation without direct attribution to specific authors. If there is a fiscal impact to the words, all financial arrangements, direct or indirect, between the beneficiaries and anyone voting on the measure must be disclosed in the legislation. Failure to include these associations or concealment of financial impacts will render the legislation void." posted by Dave on 12:10 AM | 0 comments link
Salon.com News | "An irresponsible exercise in political chicanery"It's nice to know that for all that federal pork we've been shipping to West Virginia, at least we get to have a Senator with balls in return. I think the nation as a whole gets the better end of the deal. Senators with integrity are a lot rarer than dollars. posted by Dave on 12:08 AM | 0 comments link
The Rittenhouse Review does a number on the anti-Gore media He calls them Alpha girls, but you could call them Heathers, the men and women who collectively dominate our national media. We can all remember our high school days, the different groups that formed, the leaders, the manipulators, the popular. Rittenhouse draws the analogy, closer than anyone will like, to the national media. Read it and think about the political coverage you read every day. posted by Dave on 12:07 AM | 0 comments link
Asheville Citizen-Times--North Carolina reacts to Lillygate On homeland security bill, Congress rolls over for special interests yet again. Even in North Carolina they can recognize payoffs to Republicans when they see them. No decent Americans see this bribe from Eli Lilly as legitimate. posted by Dave on 12:07 AM | 0 comments link
Whose Hands Are Dirty? Lillygate and White House involvement. posted by Dave on 12:06 AM | 0 comments link -------------------- Monday, November 25, 2002
The Fingerprints on Lillygate posted by Dave on 11:44 PM | 0 comments link
P.L.A. - A Journal of Politics, Law and Autism The public cost of Lillygate. posted by Dave on 11:42 PM | 0 comments link
Lillygate posted by Dave on 11:23 PM | 0 comments link
Salon.com News | Bush hails military's private sector Before you jump aboard the privatization express, remember that this push for oursourcing will dip into the same pool of contractors who brought you $60 billion of nothing. posted by Dave on 9:35 PM | 0 comments link
Over at the Volokh Conspiracy, Juan non-Volokh, made a comment about energy conservation that I wanted to respond to: Juan asserts: "Energy conservation sounds nice, but most conservation policies are either ineffective or tremendously expensive. Where conservation pays, businesses tend to do a good job of figuring it out well before the government gets into the act." Juan's update in which he expands on his position and restates his reasoning for an economically consistent energy plan. This same idea was at the heart of Cheney's Energy Plan and it's the Republican position to watch for in 2003. Here's a report citing California's experience in the last years. Here's another view of California's conservation efforts from LADWP. Conservation saved California's ass from the Texas corporate bandits, and it can work for the Saudi bandits as well. All it will take is national will. Juan asserts that conservation is tremendously expensive. Conservation and energy efficiency solutions are subject to the same return on investment analysis that any other project has to meet. Some steps like ceiling insulation are no-brainer fast paybacks while others like photovoltaic systems make sense only for remote locations at today's prices. If you want to factor in the armed guards patrolling nuclear power plants, the Defense Department build up to protect the Persian Gulf, and the forthcoming costs of our adventure in Iraq, you could easily make the case that our current energy policies distort market prices out of any semblance with reality. By far the most tremendously expensive energy we buy is the single barrel of oil that covers the rent for a terrorist living in San Diego. Smart cost effective investments today include wind energy, particularly in the Dakotas and west Texas , upgrades to process equipment, right-sizing electric motors for operational efficiency, and such simple things as upgrading fluorescent lights to the more efficient T-8s, using LCD traffic lights, etc. You don't have to be a research whiz to realize that Cheney's original plan calling for a new power plant to be built every week was grossly out of scale the day it was proposed. Even the Navy has demonstrated far more conservation than people expected or Cheney acknowledges. Our national energy mix contains as many irrational exemptions as the tax code contains loopholes. Cheney's plan has, by some measures, over $20 billion in subsidies for oil, coal, gas, and nuclear. Why? These are supposedly mature industries with their own profit streams to fund R&D. If nuclear energy requires federal insurance because of high risk to the public, shouldn't that factor into our planning for homeland security? Why should we include nuclear plants in a world where terrorists are looking for large targets? Why should we continue to import any oil? We could quickly and easily impose a docking tax on imported oil to ">encourage domestic production. We've been whipsawed by OPEC for decades and every time we start researching alternatives, our foes lower the price and ruin the oil exploration industry, wildcatters, and independent producers. If we're serious about our future, now is the time to start by engineering a 100% domestic energy industry including oil, gas, coal, wind, solar, conservation, and vastly improved automobiles. It's an engineering and a political issue and if anyone chooses not to address it that's fine. Just don't pretend there are no alternatives to a continued reliance on the Saudi teat. Update: I want to thank Juan Non-Volokh for his gentle treatment of my bad manners. He may be anonymous, but he is undoubtedly gracious and thoughtful. posted by Dave on 10:33 AM | 0 comments link -------------------- Sunday, November 24, 2002
Mr. Bush and Tobacco (washingtonpost.com) Come on boys and girls. Do we really want the US to be known for pushing unregulated tobacco onto the world. Is that what our image is to be? We'll overthrow you if we don't like you, and, by the way, we'll help you smuggle cigarettes to avoid those evil taxes your government charges. It's bad enough that John McCain has to accouse our own companies ofwar profiteering. Having American firms be indicted as smugglers is just a step too far outside the bounds of proper corporate behavior. Mr. Bush, have you no shame? Stop protecting these firms from justice. Smoking by state (big pdf) posted by Dave on 10:52 PM | 0 comments link
Defeated G.O.P. Congressman to Be Consultant for A.C.L.U. I was delighted to donate to John Linder to drive Bob Barr out of Congress. His vitriol and fixation on Bill Clinton's penis made him a divisive force out of all proportion to the good he could do. I'm happy to say Barr's new position consulting for the ACLU is a win for everyone. Mr. Barr can unleash his tenacity on behalf of protecting the privacy of Americans, a campaign he always fought for everyone except Mr. Clinton. On the other side, right wing opponents of the ACLU will now have to reconcile their pet phrase "card-carrying ACLU member" with the presence of both Bob Barr and Dick Armey as key advisors to the civil liberties group. On this issue and others as diverse as energy conservation and free trade, there is no reason why left and right can't cooperate to oppose the crony capitalism and moralist snooping of the current administration. There's plenty of room to disagree on tax policy, welfare, and the proper role of the federal government after finding agreement on civil liberties and smart, long-term protection of our resources. So Mr. Barr, congratulations and best wishes on your new position. posted by Dave on 2:53 PM | 0 comments link
The Sacramento Bee -- sacbee.com -- Peter Schrag: A message from the judge -- Is Ashcroft listening? A thumping Ashcroft richly deserved. posted by Dave on 2:16 PM | 0 comments link
Significant omissions in Osama tape - NOV 22, 2002 A lot more detail about the whereabout of Osama than anybody in the US government has deigned to share with the population. Of course it could all be BS, but it's interesting to hear some speculation about why Osama didn't name any of the Pakistani terror incidents in his tape. Interesting and troubling. posted by Dave on 2:16 PM | 0 comments link
Paying the SUV Bill (washingtonpost.com) I cast about, from time to time, in search of ammunition. The perfect logic, the unassailable argument, that wins the day against the deniers of global warming, the snug and cozy in their three ton personal commuter vehicles, and the Jerry Falwells who insist it's their God-given right to crush smaller cars beneath their might treads. It's hard to to do. Pleas for understanding and global cooperation don't muster much horsepower when the counter arguments regard safety of a spouse and children or purely personal choice. This article isn't a bold winner, but it points at the communal nature of the underlying problem. Each driver's choice is a drop in the ocean, but collectively we are bumping up the pollution to unacceptable levels. Extended to a global atmosphere, the US is a flat out greedy son of a bitch dumping more pollution and CO2 into the air than our fair share. In the final analysis, convincing ourselves that it is morally right to use our share of resources and no more is the only feasible solution to ending our reliance on foreign oil and giant cars. Whether we legislate it onto ourselves or act individually in favor of a healthier planet doesn't really matter. posted by Dave on 2:15 PM | 0 comments link
Payoffs, pro and con, in Homeland Security Politics is a contact sport, so some grass stains, twisted ankles, and hurt feelings are probable. In this Financial Times piece they analyze the winners and losers on this bill. The most striking sentence for me was the one discussing the protection from lawsuits for Eli Lilly. Here's the money line: "No member of the House has yet claimed any responsibility for putting the measure into the 500-page bill before it was passed." Excuse my blatant stupidity, but I would imagine my fellow citizens wouldn't endorse a process for legislation that left no fingerprints. If a legislator won't stand up, line by line, to support a bill, they shouldn't be allowed to introduce it or stick it into an unrelated bill. Let's call it the Balls Amendment. It's real simple. Here's the proposed text. "No words shall appear in any bill or legislation without direct attribution to specific authors. If there is a fiscal impact to the words, all financial arrangements, direct or indirect, among the beneficiaries and anyone voting on the measure must be disclosed in the legislation. Failure to include these associations or concealment of financial impacts will render the legislation inoperative." posted by Dave on 2:15 PM | 0 comments link
Salon.com News | "An irresponsible exercise in political chicanery"It's nice to know that for all that federal pork we've been shipping to West Virginia, at least we get to have a Senator with balls in return. I think the nation as a whole gets the better end of the deal. Senators with integrity are a lot rarer than dollars. posted by Dave on 2:15 PM | 0 comments link
Malaysian Leader/Liar/Despot disses Australia, US. Not to put too fine a point on it, but in spite of the economic success of Malaysia, due primarily to the non-Islamic inhabitants, Australia and the US can tell Dr. Mahathir to piss up a rope without too much fear of economic impact. This Prime Minister overestimates the importance of Malaysia in the global scheme of things. He's fortunate to have benevolent neighbors like Thailand and Singapore to safeguard his borders, but his internal politics by racial division and favoritism, can drag him down as quickly as it elevated him. The factores built over the last decades to take advantage of Singapore's status as a great port can be moved to friendlier climes if Malaysia proves too friendly to terrorists. The US has held its tongue over Mahathir's totalitarian instincts, but we don't have to. The Indians and Chinese who provide essentially all the dynamism in Malaysia are undoubtedly tired of being held in thrall to the Malay Islamic portion of the population that keeps a stranglehold on the levers of power. Rather than chiding the US and Australia for their policies, Dr. Mahathir would do well to open his country to the reforms and freedoms that make America a hyperpower. Islamic autocracies anywhere in the world will be over by 2020. Mahathir may as well get started now. posted by Dave on 9:56 AM | 0 comments link -------------------- Saturday, November 23, 2002
Energy Dept. Contractors Due for More Scrutiny If they want a good job done on environmental cleanup they should stop contracting with defense contractors and start working with environmentalists. What a waste of $60 billion. posted by Dave on 8:46 PM | 0 comments link -------------------- Friday, November 22, 2002
"Comparative Advantage" by Nicholas Confessore "It is considered the appropriate thing to say at a dinner party that, while Krugman is very bright, he's just too relentless on Bush," drawls James Carville. "Because to accept Krugman's facts as right makes the Washington press look like idiots." The Washington press corps look like idiots? Heavens, who could have guessed. posted by Dave on 10:55 PM | 0 comments link
The Sons Also Rise Krugman on the value of family connections. Teddy Roosevelt speaking through Paul...to Bush. posted by Dave on 8:06 AM | 0 comments link -------------------- Thursday, November 21, 2002
Rush blames DNC and McAuliffe If Terry MacAuliffe has two testicles left, he ought to sue Rush and Doug Thomspon at Capitol Hill Blue as the only two people willing to put their names on the line by directly accusing him of planning a partisan rally at the Wellstone Memorial. He has denied it, of course. DNC Chairman Terry McAuliffe told NBC's "Meet the Press" that neither he nor any other Democratic Party leaders were responsible for what went on at the Wellstone memorial. It that's the case, go after the liars who said you did. posted by Dave on 11:34 AM | 0 comments link
Here's Rush promoting a sponsor based on hatred for Wellstone This is the sickest commercial use I have seen of the Wellstone Memorial. Rush is using it to sell beds. The caller here saw nothing but hate during the Wellstone memorial. Not the one I saw. posted by Dave on 11:15 AM | 0 comments link
Rush calling Tom Harken a hater Rush just can't abide someone asking for a better America, justice for the poor, clean air or clean water, or an end to discrimination. Listen to the audio clips at the end of this page to hear just how vile Tom Harken's comments were. During the Harken clip Rush talks over Rick Kahn's emotional wreck of a speech saying repeatedly, "I don't hear the sadness." I guess he doesn't. ' posted by Dave on 11:08 AM | 0 comments link
Rush spinning Vin's words Rush is rolling with another diatribe against the Wellstone memorial and Mondale. He makes a mistake here by quoting Vin Weber a little too precisely. Sham isn't a word often found in Rush's vocabulary. In fact, only ten times and all since Vin whispered it in his ear. "field tested", "whips up the voters". Here's Rush's own take on the matter, "...cynical, nasty, hateful display in the memory of the well-liked Wellstone... ". I would gladly pay Rush twenty bucks for the names of ten Minnesota Democrats who would have describes the Wellstone service that way the night of the memorial. Now, maybe, you'd get a bunch of dittoheads who say that's just how they feel now that Rush has clued them in that the joyous, rocking, celebration they witnessed was really cynical, nasty, and hateful. posted by Dave on 10:58 AM | 0 comments link
Rush on hate...not his of course. He manages to accuse all Democrats of being haters. Notice the nicely outlined head of Tom Daschle on the page. Rush is really getting into a denunciation of the way Democrats will do anything to win. He neglects to mention Saxby Chambliss. posted by Dave on 10:16 AM | 0 comments link
Rush Is Right: Democrats: Blacks Belong In Back of Bus Rush, Rush, Rush. so wrong, so vicious, so attuned to the Republican spin of the day. Hey, let's suppress black turnout. Make it sound like the Democrats hate black candidates! Here's the real story from Alan "that guy" Page. Here's an excerpt: "I find it offensive and unacceptable that forces beyond my control have used me as a vehicle to interject race into Minnesota's political debate,'' Page said. posted by Dave on 10:13 AM | 0 comments link
Rush on Democratic chicanery, "I've had this confirmed from two different sources now. The whole Wellstone memorial was planned in Washington. Wellstone's sons had nothing to do with it. The request of Cheney to stay away was not the Wellstone sons and it had nothing to do with security. They just didn't want Cheney because they were going to hold a rally.” posted by Dave on 10:12 AM | 0 comments link
Railing Against Rush (washingtonpost.com) Well, when Howard Kurtz goes over the edge, he really goes for it. Calling Rush a mainstream conservative will do more to define the Republicans than anything the Democrats have been able to do. I'll leave you with one of Rush's favorite and simple neologisms: femi-nazi. Think of that in respect to Godwin's Law: [Usenet] "As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one." There is a tradition in many groups that, once this occurs, that thread is over, and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically lost whatever argument was in progress... posted by Dave on 9:49 AM | 0 comments link -------------------- Wednesday, November 20, 2002
Insider calls gas price lists incorrect / Ex-trader testifies to state senators More and more and more and more. The Energy Scandal that won't die. posted by Dave on 12:40 AM | 0 comments link -------------------- Monday, November 18, 2002
A false sense of security I bet y'all thought we were focused like a laser on Homeland Security, right? posted by Dave on 12:33 AM | 0 comments link
You Are a Suspect I don't often agree with Nixon's famous speechwriter, but he's among the few people on the conservative side of the spectrum who is raising the alarm about the dangerous over-reaching in the new Homeland Security Bill. Along with Bob Barr, another strong conservative, he points out the perils of entrusting too much knowledge to the government. Call your Senators today to ask them to vote down this broad reach into your private domain. posted by Dave on 12:32 AM | 0 comments link -------------------- Sunday, November 17, 2002
Press Releases by Congresswoman Pelosi Attention Sean Hannity. Here it is in all its glory. Pelosi's challenge to Speaker Hastert to stop voting against the AMA, Federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institutes of Health, the General Accounting Office and the National Academy of Sciences. From my perch, I think Hastert and Hannity have a losing hand, but when did demagogues ever let science and reason get in the way of emotion, particularly hatred and fear. Pandering to special interests for agriculture or steel is one thing; legislating and broadcasting in favor of hate and death enters a new realm of evil. Welcome to the new dawn of compassionate conservatism. posted by Dave on 8:13 PM | 0 comments link -------------------- Thursday, November 14, 2002
Spinsanity - Making Bush tell the truth That's right, fellows. Step right up to the window over here and have a look at the Dissembling Loons. posted by Dave on 11:02 PM | 0 comments link -------------------- Wednesday, November 13, 2002
Documents Reveal Enron's Clout on Energy Agenda Here's the Enron version of dealing with the politics of energy: "The White House must link the Democrats to "blackouts, waste, Luddites, regulation, government ownership, stagnation" while positioning Bush as the agent of "abundan[ce], efficiency, new economy, innovation, open markets," the document said." I've got my own suggestions. For Bush's team, backwards, reactionary, oily, fossilized, destructive, unsafe, vulnerable, weak. For my new bipartisan team made of environmentalists and Western states with high wind energy potential; revolutionary, advanced, bold, innovative, secure, strong, independent, can-do. They lose. posted by Dave on 11:40 PM | 0 comments link
Old Granny D has a story to tell. I gotta tell you she makes a lot of sense to me for a 92 year old broad. posted by Dave on 5:47 PM | 0 comments link
Good reasons to cancel your next trip to Georgia Support for the confederate flag and the disgraceful disrespect shown to an American hero, Max Cleland. Any state so devoid of moral values doesn't deserve your hard earned dollars. Let's hear it for the family values of Georgia; lying, race-baiting, and dishonor. It would be in poor taste to conclude this column without one other mention. Zell Miller is owned lock stock and barrel by development interests. If you are choking in smog on bumper to bumper freeways near Atlanta, thank Zell. Thanks to him as well from the automotive engineers of the world who he dissed by legislating against any efforts to make pickup trucks more efficient. For some unknown reason the people of Georgia think this man is a treasure. To my mind, he should hang up the saddle the monied interests ride him with and go home. He's a disgrace to the very concept of honorable public service. posted by Dave on 9:24 AM | 0 comments link
A Pack Not a Herd Glenn Reynolds elaborates on the concept of a prepared citizenry first outlined in a Jim Henley piece. I'm a strong supporter of their central idea; that the average American is a key element in homeland defense, national security, and reconstruction. Long may we survive and thrive. posted by Dave on 8:21 AM | 0 comments link -------------------- Tuesday, November 12, 2002
Election will make life better -- for the rich Dan Gilmoor is a pretty down to earth guy. This column should clear up any misunderstandings about the relationship between the Bush administration and capitalism, competition, free enterprise, and sound fiscal policy. posted by Dave on 11:25 PM | 0 comments link -------------------- Sunday, November 10, 2002
Fallout from a Memorial Here's a sober look at some of the numbers generated by one of the key Republican spin campaigns. Keep in mind that the only national broadcast of the Wellstone Memorial was on C-SPAN, but 68% of voter knew about it. Critically, 67% of independents said it made them less likely to support a Democrat. There's your election's set, point, and match in one tidy decision. It took a brilliant gamble by Karl Rove to assume the Democrat's would be taken by surprise by accusations of overt partisanship, and he was right. The Minnesota Democrats, in particular, were still in shock and reeling from Wellstone's death. They weren't prepared for the level of political cannabilism practiced by the national Republicans. Nobody has been. Not Max Cleland, the war hero accused of being unpatriotic. Not Jean Carnahan, disbelieving as Jim Talent morphed before her eyes from a hard right conservative to a centrist. If 2002 represents the discourse the media are willing to accept as truthful, woe unto us. The Fourth Estate is dead. Long live the Pundits. Long Live the Partisans. Long Live the Manipulators. posted by Dave on 4:10 PM | 0 comments link -------------------- Friday, November 08, 2002
USATODAY.com - Medicaid patient dies. Who gets the house? Our millionaire President and millionaire Senate and Congress are busy debating the "Death Tax" that affects a miniscule number of American millionaires. The numbers are debatable, but under the Democrat's plan of a six million dollar exemption, there are probably fewer than 3,000 estates nationwide. I'm sorry they had a death, but hell, 6 million bucks is a lot more than most people ever see. Stick it in some tax free minicipal bonds and kick back and live on the interest. As far as I'm concerned, the government should take 100% of the rest to keep the heirs from getting too lazy. If the dead folks are anti-tax, they can give it away themselves before they kick the bucket. Does the disrespectful tone bother you. It's nothing to get personal about. You're dead or you're not, and if you're reading this, you're not, so shut up. If you're rich, give your dough away. If you're poor, you're already screwed, but keep reading anyway. The real death tax is the claim that Medicare puts on the home of someone who needed nursing home care and couldn't pay for it. Just like everything in this cockamamie country, if you're rich enough you could hire a lawyer to make a trust to shield your assets and you're home free. And so are your kids. Getting your home free that is. On the other hand, the classic hard working, butt busting, never got a break family that sweats and toils and makes this country go gets a hand upside the head. As rapidly as a week after their parent dies, the government is required, required, mind you, to go after any assets in order to pay off Medicaid. The rich don't pay, the plan-ahead folks don't pay, but the regular folks have to fork it over. Now you may think the estate tax that Bush calls the "Death Tax" is bad, but 99.5% of people never have to pay a penny. Let's deal with the real "Death Tax" and let our middle class and hard working families pass their homes to their children even if they have the misfortune to require nursing home care. Let's stop lying to the people about the fake death tax and start talking about the real one. Read Laura Parker's article for the details. You might also want to find out why Texas and Florida don't participate. You think it might have something to do with the Bush name? posted by Dave on 11:32 PM | 0 comments link
BW Online | November 8, 2002 | Deflation: The Clear and Growing Danger Chris Farrell really rips Bush on fiscal policy and the growing dangers in our economy. Here's a sample: Still, fiscal-policy management has been largely inept. The Bush Administration's tax cut, largely skewed toward the wealthy in future years, has done little for the economy. Its economic summit in Waco, Tex., was a joke. posted by Dave on 10:42 PM | 0 comments link
The No-Gloat GOP Howard Kurtz continues his descent into irrelevance today with a claim that the press corps is bored with a one party government. Gee, maybe if they started acting like a press corps instead of a poodle corps they could do some, you know, like maybe investigative reporting. Prying Woodward's nose from Karl Rove's posterior might be impossible, but maybe there's some other folks at the Post who remember what it's like to work for a serious newspaper. There's no shortage of scandals; it's the chasers that are in short supply. I notice that Howard had no comment about Jack the Ripper's wickedly funny blast at the Post's headline writers taking dictation from Karl Rove. Funny because small town dailies across the country wrote more accurate and less sycophantic headlines. posted by Dave on 11:34 AM | 0 comments link -------------------- Thursday, November 07, 2002
Sonny Perdue channels Martin Luther King Jr. In a cynical and vile display of bad taste, Sonny Perdue has appropriated the precious and honored "free at last" words of Dr. Martin Luther King. His political misappropriation of these words is a far more serious insult than the Democrat's memorial service for Paul Wellstone. In that case, a grieving speaker inspired the mourning crowd with a passionate speech on behalf of Wellstone's beliefs. A cynical and coordinated Republican campaign tried to make this out to be inappropriate when it was, in fact, a deeply moving service. In the Perdue violation, a cynical, divisive, race-baiting Republican stood in front of a confederate flag and used Dr. King's words as part of a victory speech. Perdue is a pathetic throwback to an era when the south was segregated, hateful, and backwards. His actions yesterday indicate he belongs to that past. It's a blight on Georgia voters that they saw fit to replace a modern, thoughtful governor with this hack. For all the voters who didn't participate, the shame is on you as well. A non vote is as good as a vote for this bigot. You also participated in the shameful election of Saxby Chambliss, a man whose cowardice can only be assumed because of the way he treated Max Cleland, a true war hero. It's one thing to battle with ideas and principles, but to equate a brave American hero with Saddam Hussein is a despicable, low down trick. It's a sad day when a once-proud state like Georgia can be represented by sleazy bigots and cowards. The days of ethical heroes like Martin Luther King and Jimmy Carter are over. Long live the Confederate flag and the racial intolerance and bigotry it represents. You're now free to rejoice in the history of slavery, lynching, and violence that flag represents. May it fly high over the statehouse and every polluting pickup fouling the air of Atlanta. Hoist it high over the offices of CNN, Coca Cola and other corporate entities who thought Atlanta was the home of the future. In the meantime, this patriotic American won't set foot in your state until you decide the flag that's important is the Stars and Stripes and not the stars and bars. That war ended 147 years ago. You lost. posted by Dave on 11:00 PM | 0 comments link
Fighting for America's Energy Independence posted by Dave on 10:12 PM | 0 comments link
TRB FROM WASHINGTON Civil War by Peter Beinart Printer friendly Post date 11.06.02 | Issue date 11.18.02 E-mail this article Things are about to get ugly in the Democratic Party--and it's about time. posted by Dave on 3:41 PM | 0 comments link
The Barbarians at the Gates of Paris by Theodore Dalrymple A grim tale from Paris that explains French timidity at the bold US moves against Iraq. We are a nation of immigrants that welcomes new arrivals. The French have segregated, economically and physically, their North African immigrants. They are unemployed, unwelcome, and unremittingly hostile to authority. They are also very well armed. Not a nice situation. I'm almost sympathetic for France...almost. posted by Dave on 12:49 AM | 0 comments link -------------------- Wednesday, November 06, 2002
Bentsen Op-Ed on the Deficit Another op-ed drafted by Brad DeLong that smacks Bush's fiscal policy between the eyes with a two by four. Read it and weep at our national stupidity. Not for electing Bush, but for electing a rubber stamp Congress whose members have collectively forgotten this lesson. posted by Dave on 10:25 PM | 0 comments link
A Capital Gains Tax Cut Op-Ed It's nearly impossible to believe how far from reality the Bush administration economic policies are. This 1995 op ed by Brad DeLong demolishes the Gingrichian proposals for capital gains tax cuts by identifying the fantasy at the heart of Republican tax proposals. Keep this in mind next week the administration will undoubtedly introduce their next round of tax cuts aimed, not at business, but at the wealthy. posted by Dave on 7:41 PM | 0 comments link
Global Warning Politically ugly, a thorn in the foot, a scratchy fingernail on the blackboard. Who wants to hear about global warming, wasted energy, SUV's, and all the mushy science and environmentalism? Maybe it's why dentists are never popular guys. They're doing good, but they cause pain and they're just a little bit weird. Mark Hertsgaard has a new book out about how the world sees the US. Getting the message to the American voter that something is wrong in our relations with the rest of the world is tough, particularly now, when Bush is triumphal and unilateral and bombastic and the great bulk of the population is going along with it. One reason for that is the failure of the American media (now there's a novel idea) to actually deliver news beyond snipers and Bush trips and Gary Condit and shark attacks. For instance, how many people know that SEC Chairman Pitt resigned in the dead of the night on election day. That was a nicely muzzled story and I'm sure that Karl Rove had something to do with it. Anyway, our compliant media are not telling the story of the world to America very well. One story line that appeals to my sense of fair play, and probably to many Americans, is the "per capita" issue of energy and pollution. The simple thesis is that nobody should freely pollute the air more than any other person. I think most Americans would buy into that idea in a generic way. When they are told they pollute 45 times more than an Indian or Chinese, however, they might start to reconsider. If, however, it became a national goal to make the United States a "per capita" compliant country, the rest of the world would consider that a supremely honorable thing to do. If, during the course of our compliance, we re-invented US industry, took the global lead in pollution control, developed solar and wind and efficiency technologies that were world class, eliminated our need for foreign oil, and basically ended smog in the US, well, that would be a good thing. Worthy of our engineering talents. Worthy of our effort. When the daily grind ends some day, pause and think about the larger picture of our country. What are our goals as a nation? We're already the global hyper power, and we outspend everybody else by miles on defense, so we can't really get usefully stronger. We're already in space and could do more, so that's one area where we could set goals. We're spending billions on medical research and we're finding some cures, but there are intellectual limits to how many people we can engage in medical R&D, and we're not even managing basic health care for 40 million of our brothers and sisters. Maybe goals in health care for everyone make sense. Other people may claim that setting goals as a nation is a silly idea. It's not as if the Constitution calls for a federal government with a vision. The states aren't called to this any more than the feds. But somehow, from George Washington's day through Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt and John Kennedy and Ronald Reagan, our best leaders have challenged us. Kennedy's lunar landing is probably the best example of a national goal executed by the feds, but actually done by American engineers, workers, and companies on behalf of all of us. Many people are rethinking concepts of service, particularly after 9/11. An attack against our own civilian population stirred millions to volunteer, to donate blood and money and truckloads of goods. The moment passed, however, with no calls for service. The volunteers went home, many not having been allowed to help. Much of the blood was thrown away, too much having been procured. Truckloads of goods were also thrown away, raised unnecessarily or mislocated or invisible in the chaos. A federal structure might have helped to avoid the waste and channeled the volunteer energies more effectively. Don't misunderstand. I think the entire structure of our society was brilliant and shining with the glow that comes from serving others. Rudy Giuliani will never be forgotten for his staunch role as the dust and debris still rained down on his city, and the municipal, state and federal workers were heroic. I wouldn't change and couldn't imagine a more honest and American reaction than what happened in those days after disaster struck. I'm thinking more about the emptiness of so many lives that are now lived with no greater goal than to survive another day, work another week, kill time until retirement. Sure, most people have personal goals i addition to survival. Put a kid through college, lower their golf score, get that place at the beach, or cook the perfect hamburger. It's just that there's room for more in the American spirit. On top of school and work and church and PTA and soccer and TV, there's just room for something bigger than each of us individually. I think the goal of making the US a "per capita" compliant nation is one of those goals. It needs a catchier title, of course, but the idea that we are greedy isn't one that most Americans would be comfortable with. We see ourselves as generous, and we are. We see ourselves as fair-minded, and we are. What we don't see is the view of our energy consumption and pollution from abroad. The Kyoto Treaty was a modest step towards reduction of our pollution levels, but like many international treaties, it was biased, bureaucratic, and unfair. In light of the current administration's preference for unilateral solutions, how much better would it be for us to declare that by 2020 we will be a "per capita" compliant nation and by 2040 we will be a "zero impact" nation. That's a goal that is far beyond what people are planning today, but which is achievable by a national effort that would stimulate technology and the imagination in the same way the Apollo program did in the sixties. I issue a challenge to any politician or party who wants to seize the American imagination. Help us become a hyper power not just of might and military prowess, but of fairness and innovation. Take some of the billions of dollars for missile defense and start channeling them towards clean energy and a new approach to our status in the world. The effort to be fair will do more for our security than any possible missile defense could ever do. posted by Dave on 3:25 PM | 0 comments link -------------------- Tuesday, November 05, 2002
Full credit to the Republicans for a well choreographed and executed election. They planned far ahead, scheduled the Iraq war just as Karl Rove wanted, befuddled the Democratic leadership (not hard), and the President worked his butt off the last few weeks campaigning for his favorites. Mix in a good selection of dirty tricks and voter suppression and presto chango, you've got yourself a Senate majority. posted by Dave on 11:04 PM | 0 comments link
Voter Hassling in Pennsylvania National Republican fingerprints all over this one. posted by Dave on 3:37 PM | 0 comments link -------------------- Monday, November 04, 2002
U.S. Is Reported to Kill Al Qaeda Leader in Yemen You don't have to be a weatherman to know which way the wind blows today in Yemen. To all who decry warmongering and unilateral pursuit of Al Qaeda, tough luck. To those who long for lengthy jury trials, Miranda warnings, and the fifth amendment, too bad. This report is good news for people who want to live in peace and tolerance for ethnic diversity. Six haters, six jihadis, six warriors against modernity, are now toast. Bon appetit, Satan. posted by Dave on 10:49 PM | 0 comments link
How much of a sleazy person do you have to be to violate the trust of a student and the student's family. Well, you could ask Lynda or Tony Beltrani. They are the brother and sister-in-law of Mike Beltrani who called Hortencia Osorio to offer her money for her story about Mark Pryor. The Washington Times and Drudge Report (archived Drudge file) and the Arkansas Republican Party have done their best to hype this non-story, but the press release linked above answered the most serious of the allegations. The back story promises to be more interesting than the article that was written. Arkansas has a reputation for political tattle tales that goes far beyond the Scaife-funded Troopergate and fanciful Paula Jones tales. This tale of ethical shoddiness in De Queen centers on two educators with a brother who's an alderman on the city council. Beset, no doubt, with delusions of Drudgian power, they violated the confidences they learned in the schools without bothering to get all the facts. Instead we have Drudge wrong again and the Washington Times out on an unsupportable limb with sloppy research and writing that is to journalism what George Bush is to elocution. Wrong, wrong, wrong. Just in case Matt Drudge or Mike Beltrani wonders what laws they may have broken, here's the relevant data: ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION (big pdf of all the ethical guidelines) RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING ETHICAL GUIDELINES AND PROHIBITIONS FOR EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATORS, EMPLOYEES, BOARD MEMBERS AND OTHER PARTIES January 2002 For non-employees 6.02 Any person attempting to influence a public educational entity board member, administrator, or employee to knowingly violate the provisions of these rules and regulations may be subject to the criminal penalties provided for in Act 1599 of 2001 and the Arkansas criminal code. For Lynda and Tony Beltrani, this is the relevant statute: For Employees 4.03 No board member, administrator, or employee shall knowingly disclose any confidential information gained by reason of his/her position or use such confidential information for his/her personal gain or benefit. Oh well, so much for morality, family values, and clean campaigns. Maybe before Mark Pryor, the current attorney general, takes over as Governor of Arkansas, he can bring the proper charges against these people and anyone else who would pollute an election. posted by Dave on 3:19 PM | 0 comments link
Ahmad Abd Al-M'uti Higazi This MEMRI translation of some recent writings by the Egyptian poet and intellectual should give hope to those who despair of a rational dialog with the Islamic world. His views on women and democracy and the necessity to continually interpret religion according to an evolving world are a clear indicator that some in the Arab world are still capable of self analysis. posted by Dave on 11:39 AM | 0 comments link -------------------- Saturday, November 02, 2002
Money for School Lunches Diverted to Livestock, Report Indicates (washingtonpost.com)First the Republicans tried to call ketchup a vegetable. Now they're taking school lunch and commodity food funding to spend on livestock relief so Bush's handpicked candidate can brag about bringing home the bacon. I think the voters of South Dakota are too smart for this baloney. posted by Dave on 12:27 AM | 0 comments link -------------------- Friday, November 01, 2002
America's Most WantingA comi-tragic look at the buffoons and louts who have made Congress dysfunctional. Bipartisan, funny, and completely unafraid of naming names. It's rare to see something written with such candor in any major paper. posted by Dave on 11:03 PM | 0 comments link
The New Yorker: The Talk of the TownOn the two year anniversary of the Ascent of the Unelected. posted by Dave on 10:08 AM | 0 comments link
South Dakota Election Coverage | Election | Barnett: No illegal ballots found Still no fraud. Still a big issue with the Republicans. They'll stop at no scam, no dirty trick, no lie in order to win. Here's the flyer the Republicans are sending out. Keep in mind they have the Attorney General's results on zero illegal ballots and they are still mailing this. posted by Dave on 9:46 AM | 0 comments link
St. Louis Post-Dispatch: SEC heads for clash over accounting board Here's the guy who could have broken the story on Webster's role on the audit board before he was voted onto the Oversight Board...I'm sure Neil Roland is still kicking himself. posted by Dave on 9:37 AM | 0 comments link
The New Republic Online: Soft SellMissouri Senate race dirty tricks posted by Dave on 9:21 AM | 0 comments link
Traverse City Record-Eagle - News Story -- www.record-eagle.comMichigan governor's race dirty tricks. posted by Dave on 9:21 AM | 0 comments link -------------------- |